To me there are three characters in the film that deserve to be called hero's. The three characters are General Vasily Ivanovich Chapaev, Commissar Furmanov, and Petka.
I feel that Chapaev is a hero because he transformed from a grumpy mean man into someone who does what he does to help others. In the final fight scene (for example) he tells the others to flee to the next town while he stayed to hold off the white army. Of course this was not entirely heroic... the general did this because of his ego, saying "Chapaev never retreats."
When General Chapaev said this Petka carried him out of the building that was literally falling to the ground. Petka also stayed behind with the general after he was told to leave. He knew that the general had a much better chance surviving if he helped fend off the enemy. It is for these reasons that I feel Petka deserves to be called a hero.
Last but not least, I believe that Commissar Furmanov deserves to be called a hero because of the changes he influenced throughout the film. He was responsible for returning the stolen goods to the peasants. He somehow managed to get the general to realize he needed to change his ways. These and many other acts of kindness came from Commissar Furmanov or someone that he influenced.
I would also argue that Anka could be considered a hero too. After all, when Petka was unable to do the machine-gunning, she quickly learned it and filled in for him, doing a wonderful job.
ReplyDeleteI have a hunch the film's lighter touches (particularly some of those scenes between Chapaev and Furmanov; Chapaev and Petya; and Petya and Anka) were as much (if not more) responsible for the film's popularity amongst Russians as were the serious, dramatic portions.
ReplyDelete